The Greece Created by the Revolution

British author and historian, Mark Mazower, reflects on the birth of the Greek nation and the struggle for political liberty following the Revolution.


Aged well over one hundred, Apostolos Mavrogenis died at the end of 1906, the last surviving veteran of the Greek Revolution. Born in Paros at the end of the 18th century, he had fought throughout the war. When the statue of Kolokotronis on horseback was unveiled in Nafplion in 1901, Mavrogenis was there to testify to the memory of the man he called his friend. At the time of Mavrogenis’ birth, Athens was an Ottoman backwater; by the time he died, it was a national capital, with boulevards and streets with names, linked by rail to the new port of Piraeus and by steamship with Europe via the new Isthmus canal. There were universities and university students, libraries and newspapers, theaters and brothels, all of them largely unknown under the Ottomans. The transformation wrought by independence reached into every domain of life.

Under the sultan, different regions had been governed in very different ways. After independence, administration was centralized, and Greeks throughout the kingdom were ruled in a uniform fashion by a prefectural system engineered by the central state. For the first time, government became a matter of mass politics. It is true that in the Ottoman Peloponnese, there had been a kind of factional politicking for elite families. But it was only after the revolution that politics – with parties, a press, and a language of government, rights and constitutions derived from Europe – predominated among the Greeks.
 
Independence also gave birth to a modern capitalist economy. It was no coincidence that some of the most ardent philhellenes had been instrumental in helping raise the first national loan in 1824: international finance capital, indebtedness and the struggle for political liberty were intimately connected. Much of the economy was monetized for the first time, allowing extensive investment in land, property and – more slowly – in industries.

Despite the presence of the monarchy, the revolution gave rise to an astonishingly egalitarian society in which former Phanariot princes could find themselves addressed as Mister [“Kyrie”]. It was also, with the exception of the years of the Bavarian regency, remarkably democratic, and a new elite arose from the intermarriage of the great landowning families of the Morea, Phanariots and the children of wartime heroes. There were, of course, winners and losers. Bankers did well; the founders of the Filiki Etaireia died in poverty. While Athens grew rapidly, Tripolitsa returned to life as a small provincial town. Syros and Piraeus boomed, while the Mani and the island of Hydra – the powerhouses of the revolution – entered years of decline.
 
The Greeks were right to regard their uprising as a revolution, for what they had done was not merely to eradicate the power of the Ottoman state in their lands, but to sweep away an entire ruling philosophy and the institutions that had supported it as well. Not the legitimacy of dynasties but nation, faith, capitalism and constitutional representation were the watchwords of this new order. The fundamental principle, wrote Lord Acton in his 1862 essay on “Nationality,” was that “nations would not be governed by foreigners”: it was this principle that marked the Greek war out from the other revolutions of southern Europe around 1820, and helps explain why it was sustained and widespread and so unusually brutal and violent. Members of other oppressed peoples – Italians, Poles, Germans and others – flocked to join their fight, seeing in the success of the Greeks a promise for their own future. And though it took longer for that future to come than many of them anticipated, they were right.

The Greek Revolution, wrote an economist in 1910, was “the first manifestation of that theory of nationalities which would dominate the 19th century.” And the 20th century, too: Europe’s principalities, composite monarchies and land-based empires – some of which had lasted nearly as long as the Ottomans – gave way to new states based on the same principles of ethnic homogeneity and democratic rule that had emerged in Greece. This was the world of nation-states, the world in which we still live, which has survived even late 20th-century globalization. In its essentials, this world is the one that Apostolos Mavrogenis left behind when he died; the world of his birth is gone forever.

Mark Mazower is a professor of history at Columbia University. His new book on the Greek Revolution, published by Alexandria Publications, will appear this fall.


Read More

Editor's Pick

In its Handling of the Pandemic, Greece Sows Seeds for Recovery

Greece’s response to the coronavirus crisis so far has improved...


Editor's Pick

The Vital Role of the Maritime Industry in Greece’s History and Economy

Greek sailors played a crucial role in the struggle for...


Editor's Pick

The Colors of Greece: First Greek Flag Celebrates 200 Years

Two hundred years ago, at the First National Assembly in...


Crete

Venizelos, Kazantzakis, Xylouris: 3 Legendary Cretans

Eleftherios Venizelos, Nikos Kazantzakis, Nikos Xylouris: three larger-than-life personalities who...


Greece Is Blog Posts

Studying in Thessaloniki: The Campus on My Doorstep

BY Pantelis Tsompanis

A coming-of-age story on the streets of Thessaloniki.

read more >

I believe in Greece

BY Greece Is

Every time I see the Parthenon it takes my breath...

read more >

A House in Kritsa

BY Claire Lees Ingham

“It was all a bit spontaneous,” I say, when people...

read more >